ADDENDUM TO 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

 DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00790 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

In the applicant’s appeal for reconsideration, he requests his 
reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an 
honorable discharge; or entry level separation without 
characterization of service) be changed to a “1” code that would 
allow him to reenlist. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

On 30 September 2010, the Board considered and denied the 
applicant’s appeal, requesting his reentry (RE) code of “2C” 
(Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry 
level separation without characterization of service) be changed 
to a “1” code that would allow him to reenlist. A complete copy 
of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit E (with 
Exhibits A through D). 

 

By DD Form 149, Application for Correction of Military Record, 
dated 7 September 2011, the applicant submitted a request for 
reconsideration stating if he had been able to remain in the Air 
Force he would have been able to pass Air Force standards. His 
test results from basic training are far above the requirements 
to graduate. He desires to reenlist. 

 

The applicant provides no documentation in support of his appeal. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit F. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

We have thoroughly reviewed the evidence of record and since no 
new and relevant evidence has been provided, we find the request 
does not meet the criteria for reconsideration. As the applicant 
has been previously advised, reconsideration is provided only 
where newly discovered relevant evidence is presented which was 
not available when the application was submitted. Further, the 
reiteration of facts we have previously addressed, uncorroborated 


personal observations, or additional arguments on the evidence of 
record are not adequate grounds for reopening a case. Therefore, 
in view of the above and in the absence of new and relevant 
evidence, we find no basis to reconsider the applicant’s request. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-00790 in Executive Session on 6 March 2012, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2010-00790 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit E. Record of Proceedings, dated 20 October 2010, 

 w/atchs. 

 Exhibit F. DD Form 149, dated 7 September 2011.